Discuz! Board

 找回密码
 立即注册
搜索
热搜: 活动 交友 discuz
查看: 242|回复: 0

A completely different approach

[复制链接]

1

主题

1

帖子

5

积分

新手上路

Rank: 1

积分
5
发表于 2024-5-18 19:40:31 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
I’m not saying it’s easy. Denying someone tenure still needs to be done fairly and objectively. That would be a good place to use the kind of teacher evaluation systems that we see in leading states and cities, such as Tennessee and the District of Columbia—the type that Tim Daly and his compatriots spent so many years building. And you still must deal with the “nice principal” problem.


Perhaps tenure approval should be something Laos Phone Number Data managed at the district level, with a committee of sorts, more like how it works in higher education. Maybe it would also help if the number of tenured positions were limited. You make it so that principals or district administrators have no choice but to deny tenure to the least effective rookie teachers. Make it a forced choice. And perhaps you could then distribute tenured positions equitably to schools throughout a district, with high-poverty schools getting more than low-poverty ones.





Make it an equity play, too. Yes, we will still face the teacher shortage problem, though the end of ESSER funding—which temporarily allowed districts to hire lots more teachers—and the sharp decline in student enrollment in most districts will take care of that, at least in the short term. We won’t need, and won’t have the money for, as many teachers as we have in recent years.

回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|DiscuzX

GMT+8, 2024-11-10 12:43 , Processed in 0.039026 second(s), 18 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表